C in math, F in not eating everything

Breaking with an almost unsullied tradition of slandering Texans, I'm going to come out in support of this legislation. To commemorate the occasion, I'll use fiery rhetoric in the style of an Evangelical, minus most of the religious intolerance. It's high time we begin undoing the damage caused by a
Know who was fat? Buddha, and look what Satan has done with him. New-agers try to tell you how similar the teachings of Jesus and Buddha were. I say look to the waistline and therein know the difference. The history of man is rife with plus-sized false prophets.

There's another aspect to this, one long forgotten in today's politically correct classroom. The playground is a place of complex socio-political wrangling, a place where lessons unlearned quickly translate into friends unmade. The modern educator can't hope to teach children everything they need to survive in this networked, rolodexed world of power lunches and Christ-mandated hyper-Capitalism, but including the BMI on report cards will reinforce one of the fundamental truths of succeeding in an image-driven society. Nobody likes a fat kid. They smell, they breathe loudly and they steal your lunch when you aren't looking. F(chubby)=undesirable. That's the arithmetic of popularity, baby, and it's way more important than long division.
***
In all seriousness, do kids who already have low self-esteem need a quantification of their inability to stack up to beauty norms? I understand the health implications and definitely see the value in education to battle obesity but this needs to be implemented in a more compassionate way.
'There is no emoticon for what I'm feeling.'
8 Comments:
Yeah, kids should really wait until college before they binge-consume anything.
Excellent rant, Luke, you still got it.
But I have to say, the only thing bothering me with this body mass index grade is that the school isn't doing anything to help the poor kid to slim down. Do they teach them to NOT eat the glop they sell at lunchtime? And as I understand it, nowadays kids can opt out of P.E. for just... well... because. But they still get a grade just for showing up and sitting around. Remember, they're in a digestion-induced coma from the lunchtime slop l'orange and biscuits washed down with fudge-milk-drink-stuff.
That's just great, slap a grade on them. That'll fix everything.
i laughed when i read the headline, but inside i cried for i recognized those as the very same grades i recieved in high school.
i think i'm going to have to side with God on this one. A fat person might lead a productive life, and they might produce more than just sweat, but they will never be loved or happy. Unless they get rich of course.
Ahh...what has two thumbs and needs a drink?
-ben <---- this guy.
Ben,
Funnier and more concise than me, as usual.
Don,
That's what I meant to say, before I forgot what I was going to say, right after blogger crashed scattering 1000 words to the internet trade winds.
No excuses though, I got carried away with my Jerry Falwell impression.
Yes, by all means, let's create a NEW way to stigmatize and humiliate fat kids.
{/sarcasm}
Okay, so lets suppose that, for whatever reason, it's right to grade kids on how fit they are. There is absolutely no question that BMI is an inappropriate qualitative measure of fitness. This sounds like fat-guy hand-wringing, but the BMI is a really shitty way to measure how fat you are. It's so subjective that it hurts. I could probably stand to lose a few pounds, but I really am big-boned and well-muscled, which means that my BMI pegs me as 'obese.' I would barely call myself 'fat,' but 'obese' is out of the question.
Seriously, go find the guidelines and calculate your own BMI. If you're of average build and average lifestyle, it'll correspond reasonably well with how fat you are or not, but if you exercise a lot, or are 'husky', it'll tell you that you're soon to die of a massive heart attack. (There are limitations for people of slight build as well, but nobody really cares when they're told that they are underweight.)
If they want to grade these kids, they need to dunk them or give them the pincers to measure their body fat (even that has problems because girls have more body fat than boys, and eskimos have high body fat, and blah, blah, blah). Barring that, they should have a couple trainers come and check the kids out.
--Mike Sheffler
... turning to the 3-D map, we see an unmistakable cone of ignorance
Fuck. That was stupid. I guess all this fat is affecting my brain. I meant to say 'quantitative', not 'qualitative'. That, or maybe there should have been a comma between 'inappropriate' and 'qualitative'.
--Mike Sheffler
... turning to the 3-D map, we see an unmistakable cone of ignorance
The BMI is a stupidly simplistic measurement, weight times height, that's it. Muscle is denser than fat so fit people seem obese to this myopic multiplication table. Whatever.
You don't need an equation to know if someone is overweight.
What this is is a facelessly beaurocratic way to handle a problem whose only solution is through one on one work and education. Texas isn't willing to do that, so they throw a three digit number on a report card and say 'we tried'. It's a half-assed fix for something that, over the course of a generation, is going to require nation-wide effort
I agree with Don too Ash, obesity is a huge problem, and it needs to be corrected with education and compassion, not with the application of some number that inaccurately represents the real nature of a child's weight status.
"to grade the children on their respective weights without any kind of education regarding exercise and healthy eating would suck. If the schools are expecting them to be of normal weight, they need to teach them how to do it."
That was my point exactly, the BMI alone doesn't do this, this piece of legislation doesn't go far enough.
"Don't talk shit about Buddha please." I wasn't, I was talking shit about Evangelical Christians--the whole blog was supposed to be sarcastic, maybe that didn't come through . . .
But even Buddhism has had it's fair share of bloodshed:
Buddhism and WarThe Ethics of War, BuddhismNot perhaps to the extent of Christianity, Islam or more recent Judaism, but even Buddhists have had their fanatics. Even Buddha's words have been twisted.
Post a Comment
<< Home